argumentative paper rubric



Thesis and/or problem is vague or unclear. Background details are a seemingly random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic. Conclusion does not adequately summarize the main points. No suggestions for change or opinions are included. ______. B. MAIN POINTS. Body Paragraphs. Refutation.
Thesis Statement, Well developed introductory paragraph contains detailed background information, a clear explanation or definition of the problem, and a thesis statement. Introductory paragraph contains some background information and states the problem, but does not explain using details. States the thesis of the paper
Paper is focused and doesn't go off on tangents; Makes a point. Paper is mostly focused and does not go off on tangents; Attempts to make a point. Paper is not focused and goes off on tangents; Point uncertain. DEVELOPMENT/. INFORMATION. Includes rich supporting details. Avoids redundancy; Addresses the best
iRubric ZXXB5BW: The rubric for self editing and/or peer editing a partner's outline for his or her argumentative essay.. Free rubric builder and assessment tools.
Conclusion re- visits the claim in a new way and applies the writer's position universally. Most argumentative points are related to the thesis, but one may lack ... Argumentative Rubric. SPEECH. Using effective communication skills. 20 points. Effectively uses eye contact to communicate with audience. Uses gestures.
Thank you for your interest in the Turnitin Common Core State Standards-aligned writing rubrics. We hope you find them useful. The three rubrics in this package were developed in conjunction with the English Professional Learning Council (EPLC) and include argument, informative and narrative rubrics. Background.
Argument/Opinion Essay: Holistic Writing Rubric. Score 4: The response is a well-developed essay that develops and supports an argument. • Effectively introduces a claim. • Uses logical, credible, and relevant reasoning and evidence to support claim. • Uses an organizational strategy to present reasons and relevant
MLA Research Paper Rubric. Unacceptable. 0 points. Poor. 3 points. Fair. 6 points. Good. 9 points. Excellent. 12.5 points. Score. Resource Use. How did you use all of the research resources to support thesis? 5 or more resources. No Wikipedia. Unacceptable. Opinion Only; No research; Blatant misuse. Of research. Poor.
Directions: Your essay will be graded based on this rubric. Consequently, use this rubric as a guide when writing your essay and check it again before you submit your essay. Traits. 4. 3. 2. 1. Focus &. Details. There is one clear, well- focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate.
Argumentative Essay Rubric. Cisco Networking Academy. Instructor: WHST.11-12.9. Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Part of Paper. Exceeds Standard. (85-100). Meets Standard. (75-85). Almost meets Standard. (75-65). Does not meet Standard. (65-55). Assignment.

acknowledgement letter for phd thesis
anthropology essay outline
argumentative essay on against abortion
admission essay mba sample
advantages and disadvantages of distance learning essay
aknowledgement in thesis
apa essay template word
an example of a outline for a research paper
air pollution introduction essay
acknowledgements phd thesis harvard
animation research paper
anxiety disorder downloaded papers research sample type
an essay on safe travels
advantages and disadvantages of internet essay free pdf
aqa english language coursework a2
aqa unit 5 biology essay
argumentative essay on fetal alcohol syndrome
academic essay preparedness
acupuncture case studies for students
apiasf scholarship essay questions
adventure space essays
architecture masters thesis
apa 5th edition research paper sample
appendix essay pictures
ap literature essays prompts

Maecenas aliquet accumsan

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos hymenaeos. Etiam dictum tincidunt diam. Aliquam id dolor. Suspendisse sagittis ultrices augue. Maecenas fermentum, sem in pharetra pellentesque, velit turpis volutpat ante, in pharetra metus odio a lectus. Maecenas aliquet
Name
Email
Comment
Or visit this link or this one